Once during my college days,I tried to read a Puya.I could not even understand the first word.Even then I came to realize it's a specialist's job to read Puyas.But,like most people,the Puyas are still really intrigueing.
After posting my next to last post(which talked of three-way fight in present day Manipur),a thought has been keeping on nagging me.Is this three-way fight what the Puyas talk of as 'po ahum chainani'? I even don't know if it's an extract from a Puya but the general blelief is it is.
Even if it's all made up in my minds,this morning's headlines nonetheless tell us that one group of the three-way fight would be the 'constitutionalist'.
Much more intriguing than the fancyful links to the Puyas is the sudden realization that the likes of the person not less the super powerful,Mr Barack Obama, throws their weights behind the 'constitutuionalist'.
Barack Obama? Seriously?
Let the series of events of the past week answer it for themselves.
It turned out that Mr Barack Obama phoned his Chinese counterpart just when the clash between the Burmese soldiers and the rebels was raging near the border with China.The phone call indirectly told the Chinese president what the Americans (together with the Indians) could pulls of nasty things at their borders.Still not convinced that the particular Obama phone call is not just a simple one,loaded with indirect meaning?Then we have to remember how the Pakistan Prime Minister suddenly developed this irresistible desire to make a phone call to Mr Barack Obama.To make things even more interesting,this mysterious desire of the Pakistan prime minister began tormenting him with 48 hours of the Obama's call to the Chinese president!But it's only starting to get interesting!!For one thing,what the Pakistan prime minister told Mr Obama during the most interesting(even historic!) phone call?Get ready the answer--Mr Nawaz Sharif actually told the American president that he opposed the elevation of India to the security council of the UN!
Even if US and India were co-ordinating the rebel attacks on Burmese soldiers,what's the point in dragging in the name of Mr Obama here?
Two dates are the keys.
1)The 9th of Feb 2015.It's the date on which attack on Burmese army started.It's also the day on which the armed wing of the oldest rebel group in Manipur was born some twenty years ago.The attack on the Burmese army on this day meant as an eye for an eye reprisal for Burmese army's attack on the Kachin's stronghold at Laiza.
2)The 13th of Feb 2015.It's the day on which we first heard of the attack of the 9th.It's not an incident that Mr Rajnath Singh,India's home minister was staying the night of the 13th in Imphal.
So,if we read together the above two points,it's clear that US and India are co-ordinating in counterattacks on the oldest rebel group of Manipur.They are openly saying--'We don't have any liking for present uneven competition meted out to all other group by the oldest rebel group--so,we have started attacking the oldest rebel group--in this context,it's imperative that you should come out and co-ordinate with us in attacking this particular rebel group'.
More than the rebel groups themselves,US and India are coordinating in influencing sections of people within the Manipuri society.The timing of the visit of Rajnath Singh bears testimony to the fact the they are throwing their weights behind the 'constitionalist'(Does it mean that they would get their demand of getting a particular law enacted?I don't think so.The 'constitutionalsit' as they are today are still not acceptable to New Delhi.They want much more waterdown version.The coming
months would see New Delhi's attempts to wear down the 'constitutionalist' to their liking).
But one thing is quite certain that our compatriots like Shans,chins etc are getting more than what the 'constitutionalist' of Manipur are demanding.They are virtually independent.But they are still wallowing in the morass of smuggling,gambling and prostitution.They are selling themselves to the rising mass of China's middle class.Why don't they attempt a rise just like the Chinese are doing in front of their own eyes?
We have a similar question here also.Why don't the sophisticates in our society abandon the fine arts of pocketing New Deli's subsidy?Why don't they make a start for creative wealth making?Would the 'constitutionalist' much trumpeted Act would help us in taking the above paths?
So,what prevents us from taking that path?
To my mind,nothing short of 'enlightenment' would prepare us to take to that path.Unlike what the 'constitutionalsit' are thinking 'enlightenment' is not easy.It was shown in Europe that it was blood and tumult all the way.If we go with the 'constitutionlast' scheme of thing 'enlightenment' entail a lot signing on the official looking papers,shaking of hands and then announcing that 'we are all enlightened from this day onwards'.But history shows us that it did not work like that way.
But who would want bloodshed?Why history always demand such a huge dose of blood letting?
These are very profound questions and I'm quite certain that I'm not equal to the task of answering them.But,as the situation in Manipur is hotting up,it's everybody's responsibility to try answer these questions.With my limited knowledge,I'm tryingmy best.(I know it's the queer case of unknown blogger trying to be bit philosophical!)
To my mind.it's everything to do with putting yourself in direct bonding with that of state of being where there is primacy of information.You are trying to make sense of the information being gathered by your senses in real time.You have to act quickly on them.Otherwise,you get killed.So,there is a lot of blood.It's the stark conditions for a duelist.For enlightenment you yourself have to be a duelist fighting a series of battles with the status quo.
Until and unless you pass through that of being you can never bond with the primacy of information with the result that you are likely to be swayed by the petty propaganda flying around you.
But the tragedy here is that unless you are ready to spill your own blood as price of that experience,you can never bond with that state of being--you can never understand what a true information is--you can never let that part inside of you grow up that will enable you to distinguish between information and propaganda--you can never get 'enlightened'.
I'm using the metaphor of an individual self for the purpose of easy reasoning.Even though individual self has other means for attaining 'enlightenment',besides being a duelist,the collective self of a society has had this compulsion of going through the above mentioned state of being.This is hard lesson we learn from history.
Isn't it the sufficient reason why history demand such a huge dose of bloodletting?
After posting my next to last post(which talked of three-way fight in present day Manipur),a thought has been keeping on nagging me.Is this three-way fight what the Puyas talk of as 'po ahum chainani'? I even don't know if it's an extract from a Puya but the general blelief is it is.
Even if it's all made up in my minds,this morning's headlines nonetheless tell us that one group of the three-way fight would be the 'constitutionalist'.
Much more intriguing than the fancyful links to the Puyas is the sudden realization that the likes of the person not less the super powerful,Mr Barack Obama, throws their weights behind the 'constitutuionalist'.
Barack Obama? Seriously?
Let the series of events of the past week answer it for themselves.
It turned out that Mr Barack Obama phoned his Chinese counterpart just when the clash between the Burmese soldiers and the rebels was raging near the border with China.The phone call indirectly told the Chinese president what the Americans (together with the Indians) could pulls of nasty things at their borders.Still not convinced that the particular Obama phone call is not just a simple one,loaded with indirect meaning?Then we have to remember how the Pakistan Prime Minister suddenly developed this irresistible desire to make a phone call to Mr Barack Obama.To make things even more interesting,this mysterious desire of the Pakistan prime minister began tormenting him with 48 hours of the Obama's call to the Chinese president!But it's only starting to get interesting!!For one thing,what the Pakistan prime minister told Mr Obama during the most interesting(even historic!) phone call?Get ready the answer--Mr Nawaz Sharif actually told the American president that he opposed the elevation of India to the security council of the UN!
Even if US and India were co-ordinating the rebel attacks on Burmese soldiers,what's the point in dragging in the name of Mr Obama here?
Two dates are the keys.
1)The 9th of Feb 2015.It's the date on which attack on Burmese army started.It's also the day on which the armed wing of the oldest rebel group in Manipur was born some twenty years ago.The attack on the Burmese army on this day meant as an eye for an eye reprisal for Burmese army's attack on the Kachin's stronghold at Laiza.
2)The 13th of Feb 2015.It's the day on which we first heard of the attack of the 9th.It's not an incident that Mr Rajnath Singh,India's home minister was staying the night of the 13th in Imphal.
So,if we read together the above two points,it's clear that US and India are co-ordinating in counterattacks on the oldest rebel group of Manipur.They are openly saying--'We don't have any liking for present uneven competition meted out to all other group by the oldest rebel group--so,we have started attacking the oldest rebel group--in this context,it's imperative that you should come out and co-ordinate with us in attacking this particular rebel group'.
More than the rebel groups themselves,US and India are coordinating in influencing sections of people within the Manipuri society.The timing of the visit of Rajnath Singh bears testimony to the fact the they are throwing their weights behind the 'constitionalist'(Does it mean that they would get their demand of getting a particular law enacted?I don't think so.The 'constitutionalsit' as they are today are still not acceptable to New Delhi.They want much more waterdown version.The coming
months would see New Delhi's attempts to wear down the 'constitutionalist' to their liking).
But one thing is quite certain that our compatriots like Shans,chins etc are getting more than what the 'constitutionalist' of Manipur are demanding.They are virtually independent.But they are still wallowing in the morass of smuggling,gambling and prostitution.They are selling themselves to the rising mass of China's middle class.Why don't they attempt a rise just like the Chinese are doing in front of their own eyes?
We have a similar question here also.Why don't the sophisticates in our society abandon the fine arts of pocketing New Deli's subsidy?Why don't they make a start for creative wealth making?Would the 'constitutionalist' much trumpeted Act would help us in taking the above paths?
So,what prevents us from taking that path?
To my mind,nothing short of 'enlightenment' would prepare us to take to that path.Unlike what the 'constitutionalsit' are thinking 'enlightenment' is not easy.It was shown in Europe that it was blood and tumult all the way.If we go with the 'constitutionlast' scheme of thing 'enlightenment' entail a lot signing on the official looking papers,shaking of hands and then announcing that 'we are all enlightened from this day onwards'.But history shows us that it did not work like that way.
But who would want bloodshed?Why history always demand such a huge dose of blood letting?
These are very profound questions and I'm quite certain that I'm not equal to the task of answering them.But,as the situation in Manipur is hotting up,it's everybody's responsibility to try answer these questions.With my limited knowledge,I'm tryingmy best.(I know it's the queer case of unknown blogger trying to be bit philosophical!)
To my mind.it's everything to do with putting yourself in direct bonding with that of state of being where there is primacy of information.You are trying to make sense of the information being gathered by your senses in real time.You have to act quickly on them.Otherwise,you get killed.So,there is a lot of blood.It's the stark conditions for a duelist.For enlightenment you yourself have to be a duelist fighting a series of battles with the status quo.
Until and unless you pass through that of being you can never bond with the primacy of information with the result that you are likely to be swayed by the petty propaganda flying around you.
But the tragedy here is that unless you are ready to spill your own blood as price of that experience,you can never bond with that state of being--you can never understand what a true information is--you can never let that part inside of you grow up that will enable you to distinguish between information and propaganda--you can never get 'enlightened'.
I'm using the metaphor of an individual self for the purpose of easy reasoning.Even though individual self has other means for attaining 'enlightenment',besides being a duelist,the collective self of a society has had this compulsion of going through the above mentioned state of being.This is hard lesson we learn from history.
Isn't it the sufficient reason why history demand such a huge dose of bloodletting?