That the agitators in Churachandpur had chosen 1st to 5th Feb as the first leg of their ptogramme of agitation should act as an eye-opener for everybody.
It even prods us to ask this question--
'What will happen on the 21st of January 2016?'.
Of course,the missing link between the above statement and the question is the Americans.We have to remember that there is a pattern breaking event in Imphal on the 21st of January,mainly inspired by the Americans.
In my humble opinion,what we are seeing is the starting point heralding the call of the West to its supporters in Manipur to come out openly and challenge the constituent within the Manipuri society espousing the formation of an anti-West coalition.
In a more mundane speak,its the duel between Western-style growth story and Chinese-style growth story.
Would the supporters of the West in Manipur come out openly and start challenging their opponent on an ideological level?
I have no idea when will they do that but one thing is quite certain--the Americans are definitely nudging them to do so.
As we starts speaking about the Americans,it's definitely possible that they are becoming increasingly impatient with the pace of their ally,the Indians, in fighing that constituent within the Manipuri society which espouses the formation of the anti-West coalition.
As we are apparently confronting a looming ideological war,it's an imperative that this blogger states his own opinion about the subject.As any growth story happens within the matrix of a political environment,I think I should start with it.
Let's go hyper-local.
I think vast majority of peope in our society would agree with me that the winning candidates in the recent bye-election to the two Assembly constituencies in the heart of Imphal need to be disqualified at the very outset.They have no agenda except grabbing power.They are flesh and blood manifestations of what Barack Obama hinted as the evil impact of money on the body politic of any society.We also need not go to a far away country like the US to see things in perspective.Here,in our homefront votes are purchased openly.In the recent two bye-elections price per vote had risen dramatically--they are willing to fork out Rs 5000/-per vote.
Even if we say that the system can be reformed so that it may reach the level of what the Ameriacans are having at the moment,should we go for that option?I have no direct knowledge of the conditions in the US but it's quite certain that if you no money you have no hope to become a player in American politics.Even Barack Obama hinted at the problem in his recent State of the Union address.And,most importantly,the gains from the growth achieved through this American political system is so unevenly distributed that there is now open discussion whether the system would become untenable any time soon.
As we have gone this far,we have to ask ourselves--'What about the Chinese model?'
The Communist Party of China actually screened the aspiring candidtates for elections in Hong Kong.Is this acceptable?Before answering this question we must state that the distribution of the gains from the Chinese-style growth is more tolerable.
In other words,we all think that there should be some vetting of the candidates.The problem arises when it comes the statge where we ask loudly who should do the vetting.
Everybody knows that we are face to face with a really tough situation.But I should express my opinion fearlessly.
1)We should utilize the service of Artificial Intelligence,something like IBM's Watson to do the vetting.There is strong possibilty that AI would overtake human in intelligence around 2048.So,AI is a strong candidate to do the task of vetting.
2)Everyone who plans to go to political arena should be prepared to sacrifice substantial portion of his private space to public scrutiny.In our case,the AI agent should have access to his educational,medical and social engagement records from an early age in his life.We might even devise an empathy metrics for the candidates.
3)Then,we can devise a scale to vet the aspiring candidates for any election.For example,in the scale of 0-10 any candidate should get 8 to be eligible to fight an election.
If we go this far,we can tell our American friends that we need not make a choice between the Western and Chinese models.We should be left alone so that we can make our own choices according to our needs and dreams.We need to politely let it be known to our American friends that if any agency starts interfering in our affair,we are ready for a good fight.
It even prods us to ask this question--
'What will happen on the 21st of January 2016?'.
Of course,the missing link between the above statement and the question is the Americans.We have to remember that there is a pattern breaking event in Imphal on the 21st of January,mainly inspired by the Americans.
In my humble opinion,what we are seeing is the starting point heralding the call of the West to its supporters in Manipur to come out openly and challenge the constituent within the Manipuri society espousing the formation of an anti-West coalition.
In a more mundane speak,its the duel between Western-style growth story and Chinese-style growth story.
Would the supporters of the West in Manipur come out openly and start challenging their opponent on an ideological level?
I have no idea when will they do that but one thing is quite certain--the Americans are definitely nudging them to do so.
As we starts speaking about the Americans,it's definitely possible that they are becoming increasingly impatient with the pace of their ally,the Indians, in fighing that constituent within the Manipuri society which espouses the formation of the anti-West coalition.
As we are apparently confronting a looming ideological war,it's an imperative that this blogger states his own opinion about the subject.As any growth story happens within the matrix of a political environment,I think I should start with it.
Let's go hyper-local.
I think vast majority of peope in our society would agree with me that the winning candidates in the recent bye-election to the two Assembly constituencies in the heart of Imphal need to be disqualified at the very outset.They have no agenda except grabbing power.They are flesh and blood manifestations of what Barack Obama hinted as the evil impact of money on the body politic of any society.We also need not go to a far away country like the US to see things in perspective.Here,in our homefront votes are purchased openly.In the recent two bye-elections price per vote had risen dramatically--they are willing to fork out Rs 5000/-per vote.
Even if we say that the system can be reformed so that it may reach the level of what the Ameriacans are having at the moment,should we go for that option?I have no direct knowledge of the conditions in the US but it's quite certain that if you no money you have no hope to become a player in American politics.Even Barack Obama hinted at the problem in his recent State of the Union address.And,most importantly,the gains from the growth achieved through this American political system is so unevenly distributed that there is now open discussion whether the system would become untenable any time soon.
As we have gone this far,we have to ask ourselves--'What about the Chinese model?'
The Communist Party of China actually screened the aspiring candidtates for elections in Hong Kong.Is this acceptable?Before answering this question we must state that the distribution of the gains from the Chinese-style growth is more tolerable.
In other words,we all think that there should be some vetting of the candidates.The problem arises when it comes the statge where we ask loudly who should do the vetting.
Everybody knows that we are face to face with a really tough situation.But I should express my opinion fearlessly.
1)We should utilize the service of Artificial Intelligence,something like IBM's Watson to do the vetting.There is strong possibilty that AI would overtake human in intelligence around 2048.So,AI is a strong candidate to do the task of vetting.
2)Everyone who plans to go to political arena should be prepared to sacrifice substantial portion of his private space to public scrutiny.In our case,the AI agent should have access to his educational,medical and social engagement records from an early age in his life.We might even devise an empathy metrics for the candidates.
3)Then,we can devise a scale to vet the aspiring candidates for any election.For example,in the scale of 0-10 any candidate should get 8 to be eligible to fight an election.
If we go this far,we can tell our American friends that we need not make a choice between the Western and Chinese models.We should be left alone so that we can make our own choices according to our needs and dreams.We need to politely let it be known to our American friends that if any agency starts interfering in our affair,we are ready for a good fight.