by the meltingpot: Intriguing indeed!

Now Reading!

Indeed, what is at work in the recent return of realism is the revenge of geography in the most old-fashioned sense. In the 18th and 19th centuries, before the arrival of political science as an academic specialty, geography was an honored, if not always formalized, discipline in which politics, culture, and economics were often conceived of in reference to the relief map. Thus, in the Victorian and Edwardian eras, mountains and the men who grow out of them were the first order of reality; ideas, however uplifting, were only the second.
And yet, to embrace geography is not to accept it as an implacable force against which humankind is powerless. Rather, it serves to qualify human freedom and choice with a modest acceptance of fate. This is all the more important today, because rather than eliminating the relevance of geography, globalization is reinforcing it. Mass communications and economic integration are weakening many states, exposing a Hobbesian world of small, fractious regions. Within them, local, ethnic, and religious sources of identity are reasserting themselves, and because they are anchored to specific terrains, they are best explained by reference to geography. Like the faults that determine earthquakes, the political future will be defined by conflict and instability with a similar geographic logic. The upheaval spawned by the ongoing economic crisis is increasing the relevance of geography even further, by weakening social orders and other creations of humankind, leaving the natural frontiers of the globe as the only restraint.
So we, too, need to return to the map, and particularly to what I call the “shatter zones” of Eurasia. We need to reclaim those thinkers who knew the landscape best. And we need to update their theories for the revenge of geography in our time.
Here is the link for the whole write up.

Now at 2nd place

My view is that relations between countries in the coming decades are most likely to reflect their cultural commitments, their cultural ties and antagonism with other countries rather than other factors. Quite obviously, power will continue to play a central role in global politics, as it always does. But usually there is something else behind conflicts. In the 18th century in Europe, the issues to a large extent involved questions of monarchy versus the emerging republican movements, first in America and then in France. In the 19th century, it involved states identifying themselves through nationalism. In the 20th century, ideology came to the fore, largely, but not exclusively, as a result of the Russian Revolution. We had fascism, communism and liberal democracy competing with each other. Well, that’s pretty much over. Liberal democracy has come to be accepted, in theory at least, around the world, if not always in practice. So the question really is what will be the central focus of global politics in the coming decades? My argument remains that cultural identities, antagonisms and affiliations will not only play a role, but play a major role in relations between states. The full interview is here.

This is the 3rd

Every citizen in the City of Richardson will be able to access 756 Kbps of internet connectivity for free, from anywhere in the city. They will be able to access the internet from their homes, schools, restaurants and parks using standard wi-fi connections which are now installed on almost every notebook computer. That is almost as fast as many so-called high speed broadband connections that one pays dearly for today, and several times faster than the various hotspots at your local coffee shops. And I should note that the tax-payers of the City of Richardson are not paying one penny for this, and in fact are going to see additional revenues as a benefit. ... At the beginning of this letter, I suggested that this would be one of the fastest worldwide rollouts of a technology ever seen. It was just 20 years ago that the first cellular systems were being built. The rollout for mesh wireless systems is going to make that look slow. There are several reasons I make this assertion. But they all center on the facts that installing mesh systems will be cheaper and easier than any previous system and the economics in both the developed and especially the developing world will be so radically compelling. Throw in the fact the any astute politician will want to be at the front of this parade (They will all want to say, "I was the man who helped bring free internet to everyone!") and the groundwork is laid for rapid deployment. In Richardson and elsewhere, MeshLinx is offering the basic infrastructure for free. This avoids all the time consuming, political budget battles in the cities. When a service is offered for free, much of the mandated competitive process is eliminated. Next is the low cost of installation of the system. As noted above, Richardson is a city of roughly 100,000 people living in 27.4 square miles. It will "only" cost about $2,000,000 today to lay the wireless blanket I mentioned above. It will cost a great deal less in the future, as MeshLinx is building the pods at a pace of 100 a month today. The maximum output of the US pilot assembly line is 500 a month. When the demand exceeds this (and it will in a very short time) discussions have been held to move volume production to China. Of course, the world will need tens of millions of pods. The cost for a pod will be a fraction of today's cost, with that installation number for a city like Richardson soon being half (or less) the cost of today. What does that $1 or 2 million get you? The infrastructure to be an internet connection, telephone, security, entertainment provider and a whole lot more company. As noted, it will get cheaper as the number of pods being made each month rises, thus lowering their costs dramatically. This technology does have scale. The cost of physically putting up a pod is not a large part of the equation, as you simply need to run a power line, attach a few bolts to a mount on the side of a building or light pole and then off to the next point. Think about the 40,000 homes and businesses in Richardson. If and (hopefully) over time when 10% decide to pay $50 a month for 10-20 Mbps high speed internet access you could see a revenue of $2.5 million a year just from internet access. Now add in all the other income possibilities (phone, entertainment, security and don't forget advertising revenue on the free service!). Think about your town or country. What would service like this be worth? If you are a small city that does not have high speed connections available, how many businesses that could bring jobs do not come your way because they need reliable communications for their work and their employees? If you are in a developing country, where internet access is difficult and expensive, it will open whole new vistas. Couple that with the various programs which want to give cheap laptops to kids in poor countries, and you could see significant social progress in a generation. Here is the link.

Wednesday, June 07, 2006

Intriguing indeed!

You have to excuse me if I sound as if I’m in a perennial ‘conspiracy theorist’ state of mind. But don’t you think that the timing of the recent visit of Ms Malini Bhattacharya, member, National Commission for Woman, is quite intriguing?

About a week back, Justice Rajkhowa announced that all the girls whose statements he had personally recorded at Parbung and Lungthulien, should be ready for cross-examination by other interested counsels. (At that time, I was too harried telling you my personal ‘anecdotes’ to take note of the Justice’s announcement here. But I took a mental note of the announcement so that I could bring it up when the situations presented themselves—like today). In the same announcement, the Justice also noted that all the statements that were recorded in Hmar language were in the process of being translated into English. When completed, they would be made available to all the parties. Note that Mafyf demanded that it be supplied with all the statements.

The reaction was immediate. Hmar Women Association did not like the idea of cross-examination citing that all the girls were in varying stages of trauma and they should not be further forced to re-visit their hellish experiences.

The reply to that reaction came from Human Rights Alert. It is headed by Mr Babloo Loitongbam who, I think, has those impeccable credentials required for a non-controversial human rights activist. He said that he could understand the girls’ plight in having to re-visit their hellish experiences but cross-examination is a must for establishing the truth.

Then, he gave four or five names of women of proven rape cases but I can remember only name of Ahanjaobi, rape victim of an Indian Army soldier, who ultimately was found guilty of his crime and convicted.

Babloo said that all these women had to undergo several layers of cross-examination. He said that a woman is honour-bound to undergo any test imposed by the law of the land which will to the punishment of the perpetrators of rape.

The second point is very significant. Babloo himself was on Aizawl-Parbung circuit when the news of the mass rape just came out in the media in full force. It was before the Rajkhowa Commission was instituted. He personally met the majority of the girls who were alleged to have been raped by the rebels. In all the cases, he tried to go a little deeper into the affair by putting some more questions to the girls—all the girls demurred and said that it was an ‘attempt to rape’.

The words are ‘attempt to rape’.

When he came back to Imphal with his report, the Government of Manipur just announced the institution of a judicial commission to probe the rape cases. So, he decided not to release his report to the public but to submit it to the coming commission.

I remember him telling the media just that at that time.

It was in the middle of such points and counterpoints that Ms Malini Bhattacharya arrived in Imphal and she said:

>> In the absence of primary evidence of rape, what the purported rape victims say should be trusted. (Does she mean to say that if the girls are to be trusted, cross-examination is a waste of time?)

>>Manipur Government does absolutely nothing to alleviate the trauma of the Hmar girls ( Does she mean to say that as the girls are already in the state of traumatic shocks, anybody should not try to intensify the shock by any means—like, cross-examination?)

Well, I may sound liking a good conspiracy theory a little bit but it is still intriguing to me—very intriguing indeed!

by the meltingpot

Now Reading!

Now at 2nd place

This is the 3rd