by the meltingpot: Nura Temsing-nabi, be that SPARK.

Now Reading!

Indeed, what is at work in the recent return of realism is the revenge of geography in the most old-fashioned sense. In the 18th and 19th centuries, before the arrival of political science as an academic specialty, geography was an honored, if not always formalized, discipline in which politics, culture, and economics were often conceived of in reference to the relief map. Thus, in the Victorian and Edwardian eras, mountains and the men who grow out of them were the first order of reality; ideas, however uplifting, were only the second.
And yet, to embrace geography is not to accept it as an implacable force against which humankind is powerless. Rather, it serves to qualify human freedom and choice with a modest acceptance of fate. This is all the more important today, because rather than eliminating the relevance of geography, globalization is reinforcing it. Mass communications and economic integration are weakening many states, exposing a Hobbesian world of small, fractious regions. Within them, local, ethnic, and religious sources of identity are reasserting themselves, and because they are anchored to specific terrains, they are best explained by reference to geography. Like the faults that determine earthquakes, the political future will be defined by conflict and instability with a similar geographic logic. The upheaval spawned by the ongoing economic crisis is increasing the relevance of geography even further, by weakening social orders and other creations of humankind, leaving the natural frontiers of the globe as the only restraint.
So we, too, need to return to the map, and particularly to what I call the “shatter zones” of Eurasia. We need to reclaim those thinkers who knew the landscape best. And we need to update their theories for the revenge of geography in our time.
Here is the link for the whole write up.

Now at 2nd place

My view is that relations between countries in the coming decades are most likely to reflect their cultural commitments, their cultural ties and antagonism with other countries rather than other factors. Quite obviously, power will continue to play a central role in global politics, as it always does. But usually there is something else behind conflicts. In the 18th century in Europe, the issues to a large extent involved questions of monarchy versus the emerging republican movements, first in America and then in France. In the 19th century, it involved states identifying themselves through nationalism. In the 20th century, ideology came to the fore, largely, but not exclusively, as a result of the Russian Revolution. We had fascism, communism and liberal democracy competing with each other. Well, that’s pretty much over. Liberal democracy has come to be accepted, in theory at least, around the world, if not always in practice. So the question really is what will be the central focus of global politics in the coming decades? My argument remains that cultural identities, antagonisms and affiliations will not only play a role, but play a major role in relations between states. The full interview is here.

This is the 3rd

Every citizen in the City of Richardson will be able to access 756 Kbps of internet connectivity for free, from anywhere in the city. They will be able to access the internet from their homes, schools, restaurants and parks using standard wi-fi connections which are now installed on almost every notebook computer. That is almost as fast as many so-called high speed broadband connections that one pays dearly for today, and several times faster than the various hotspots at your local coffee shops. And I should note that the tax-payers of the City of Richardson are not paying one penny for this, and in fact are going to see additional revenues as a benefit. ... At the beginning of this letter, I suggested that this would be one of the fastest worldwide rollouts of a technology ever seen. It was just 20 years ago that the first cellular systems were being built. The rollout for mesh wireless systems is going to make that look slow. There are several reasons I make this assertion. But they all center on the facts that installing mesh systems will be cheaper and easier than any previous system and the economics in both the developed and especially the developing world will be so radically compelling. Throw in the fact the any astute politician will want to be at the front of this parade (They will all want to say, "I was the man who helped bring free internet to everyone!") and the groundwork is laid for rapid deployment. In Richardson and elsewhere, MeshLinx is offering the basic infrastructure for free. This avoids all the time consuming, political budget battles in the cities. When a service is offered for free, much of the mandated competitive process is eliminated. Next is the low cost of installation of the system. As noted above, Richardson is a city of roughly 100,000 people living in 27.4 square miles. It will "only" cost about $2,000,000 today to lay the wireless blanket I mentioned above. It will cost a great deal less in the future, as MeshLinx is building the pods at a pace of 100 a month today. The maximum output of the US pilot assembly line is 500 a month. When the demand exceeds this (and it will in a very short time) discussions have been held to move volume production to China. Of course, the world will need tens of millions of pods. The cost for a pod will be a fraction of today's cost, with that installation number for a city like Richardson soon being half (or less) the cost of today. What does that $1 or 2 million get you? The infrastructure to be an internet connection, telephone, security, entertainment provider and a whole lot more company. As noted, it will get cheaper as the number of pods being made each month rises, thus lowering their costs dramatically. This technology does have scale. The cost of physically putting up a pod is not a large part of the equation, as you simply need to run a power line, attach a few bolts to a mount on the side of a building or light pole and then off to the next point. Think about the 40,000 homes and businesses in Richardson. If and (hopefully) over time when 10% decide to pay $50 a month for 10-20 Mbps high speed internet access you could see a revenue of $2.5 million a year just from internet access. Now add in all the other income possibilities (phone, entertainment, security and don't forget advertising revenue on the free service!). Think about your town or country. What would service like this be worth? If you are a small city that does not have high speed connections available, how many businesses that could bring jobs do not come your way because they need reliable communications for their work and their employees? If you are in a developing country, where internet access is difficult and expensive, it will open whole new vistas. Couple that with the various programs which want to give cheap laptops to kids in poor countries, and you could see significant social progress in a generation. Here is the link.

Wednesday, October 11, 2006

Nura Temsing-nabi, be that SPARK.

If we are deep into a deadend ( my last post), what’s there for us in the future?

I’ll speak out my mind.

Everybody knows that the building blocks of the basic village units of the Indian heartland are injustice and injustice and more injustice. And the command strucute of this injustice unlimited is the caste system. This centuries old structure is surprisingly resilient.

Because of its resilience many well meaning people are lulled into believing that this system might well have serve a perpose. If not, why its staying power for many centuries?

To my mind, it’s not serving a purpose which is compassionate. It’s a cruel system.

The longevity of the system may well be due to the ingenuity of the power that be of those steering it. They are so ingenious that they have been able to shield off the crushing world wide criticism of their system, as was in the case of the Apartheid in the then South Africa. Essentially, the caste system is out and out apartheid in its functionality.

The reigning cliché is that one of the magic weapons used so dexterously over the centuries by the power that be is corrupting any leader who emerges to lead occasional revolt against the system. They quietly let in the leader into their surreal worlds of the ‘power that be’ land and charm the rebellious edges off him.

But it must be just that—a cliché. It cannot be the satisfactory reason why all the revolts have failed. To my mind, the crucial factor behind such failures must be the inability of the leaders to provide a tangible social system to replace the caste system.

For example, what is Mayawati’s model social system to replace the hated ‘manu vaadic’ one? Look to BR Ambedkar or to the Dravidian upsurge in Tamil land, you cannot find the vision of the alternative social system.

Now, look to Manipur. It occupies a unique position. Beyond its eastern boundary, they did not try to supplant the caste system. Look to Burma, Thailand etc. In a sense, it’s the last frontier. But in this last frontier there had been systematic resistance, and then revolt, against the caste system. The crucial factor is that they have the alternative social system to firmly oppose the caste system.

And, it has been very systematic and relentless. Look at the ‘Maichou Taret’. We will find that nearly 300 years ago they initiated the resistance against the coming caste system. Besides this initiation, they left behind enough treaties and books to outline the contours of the opposing social system.

In this sense, Manipur provides the only society in this subcontinent which has the living revolt against the caste system. For any other society trying to revolt against it, they can get a ready model from Manipur.

Looking from this perspective, it will be no wonder if our ‘Nura Temsing-nabi’ comes to provide the crucial spark for other revolts across the Indian subcontinent, all of which have been waiting to happen for several centuries now.

You never know. ‘Nura Temsing-nabi’ may well be that SPARK.

by the meltingpot

Now Reading!

Now at 2nd place

This is the 3rd